About this site

AI hiring tools - resume screeners, automated rejection systems, algorithmic risk scores - are now a normal part of applying for a job. A growing number of lawsuits and regulatory complaints are testing whether some of these tools discriminate. This site exists to track that growing body of cases in one place, in plain English, sourced from the actual court orders and agency filings wherever they're available.

Why this exists

Following one of these cases usually means piecing it together from scattered sources: a docket entry here, a law firm's client alert there, a news article that's already a few steps removed from the primary document. There wasn't a single place that just tracked the facts - what's been filed, what's been ruled on, what's still an allegation versus what's been decided - without an agenda on either side. That's the gap this site tries to fill.

What this site is - and isn't

This is an independent, unofficial reference. It is not affiliated with any plaintiff, defendant, law firm, advocacy group, or government agency named in any case it covers, and nobody involved in the actual litigation reviewed this site before it was published. It is not a law firm's docket-monitoring service, not a substitute for legal advice, and not a way to join a case or get an eligibility question answered - see the full disclaimer for exactly what that means and where to go instead.

How it's built

Each case gets the same treatment: a sourced timeline, background on who's involved, and an explanation of why it matters - built from court orders, agency filings, and companies' own public statements wherever they're available, with a link to the original document on every entry. Where a primary source wasn't available directly, entries rely on law firm or trade-publication reporting instead, and say so. Everything described as an allegation is an allegation, not a finding, until a court or agency actually rules on it.

Who runs it

This site is run independently, outside of any law firm, advocacy organization, or news outlet. It's supported by advertising (Google AdSense) - which is what funds the time spent tracking filings, reading orders, and keeping each case current, not a sponsor or party with a stake in how any case turns out.

Spot something wrong?

This is an ongoing project, not a finished one, and it can contain errors or fall behind between updates. If something here is wrong or out of date, the contact form goes straight to the person who runs it - see the disclaimer's corrections section for how corrections get handled.